Whether or not my old Roman Catholic friends will ask me directly, I feel certain many of you wonder why I chose to leave the RCC. Even if some of you don’t care, I really want you to know. That is the purpose of this letter and I hope you’ll “hear” me out.
Let me begin by saying that I have many wonderful memories of my years as a Catholic. Midnight masses, Catholic schools, serving as an altar boy—there are many things I love and respect about the RCC. In fact, I recognize that I received a great foundation—theologically speaking—in the RCC. Many of the beliefs I hold today were formed in my years as a Catholic. I believe in the Triune God of the Bible. I believe Jesus Christ is God, was born of a virgin, was crucified, died and was buried. In fact, I still hold to the Apostle’s Creed.
One of the things I regret is having argued over secondary matters. I’ve spent way too much time over the years debating matters that just aren’t that important. At one time, I wanted everyone to share my opinions about everything. I now know that not only is this not going to happen, but it just isn’t necessary. Some things just aren’t worth fighting over.However, I do believe that there are primary issues in life which demand our passionate defense and declaration. Freedom, for example, is worth fighting and dying for. The protection of the unborn, defenseless and oppressed is another cause which should be passionately defended and debated in the legislatures and courtrooms of our country. The lives of people in grave danger are worthy of putting oneself in harm’s way. For example, the firemen who went into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, understood that it was worth the risk to their lives to try to save the thousands who were in the building. Again, there are primary issues in life which demand our passionate defense and declaration.
Let me use the firemen as an illustration. What if a fireman had encountered an individual who did not believe the building was burning and was likely to collapse? What should the fireman have done? Should he have said, “Well, everyone’s entitled to his opinion” and left the guy there without trying to convince him of the danger (for fear of offending him)? I suppose some people would say, “Well, serves him right if he doesn’t believe the fireman. He deserves whatever he gets.” On the other hand, some would say that the fireman had an obligation, a duty to convince the man of the great danger he was in or even club him over the head and carry him out for his own good.
Now, I’m sure you can see where I’m going with this illustration. And I understand that it is likely that you disagree with my use of this illustration in regard to our differences. After all, I’m flattering myself by comparing myself to a fireman and you end up being the guy who doesn’t believe there’s a fire. I realize that’s not the most complimentary illustration in the world. But, please understand that this is how I understand the situation. This illustration is the best one I can come up with to demonstrate to you what I believe with all my heart. I am deeply concerned for your eternal destiny and can there be anything more worthy of my passionate declaration? Is there anything else more important? I admitted already that there have been times when all I wanted to do was win an argument. But this is not my motivation now. I can say that with complete confidence. My love for people is my motivation. My hope is that you will listen to (read) what I have to say simply because you know that I am concerned about your eternal destiny. I cannot club you over the head and carry you into heaven, but I can try to convince you of what I so strongly believe. Let me clarify: I don’t know whether or not you’re going to heaven—I don’t believe all Catholics are going to hell. But I do believe some are. I also believe some Lutherans, Presbyterians and Baptists are going to hell. In fact, lots of people who call themselves “Christians” are most likely in grave danger. This is what I’m trying to get at. More about that later.
I hope you will also listen because my opinion, my belief comes from my study of the Bible. I know there are many people who have studied the Bible and disagree with my viewpoint. But, I hope you will hear me out and consider what I have to say. If someone disagrees with me—if you disagree with me—that means one of us wrong. It can’t mean we’re both right or that it doesn’t matter. If I’m right, then what I have to say is a matter of life and death—eternal life and death. And, I believe that what I have to say to you is what the Bible—the ancient, time-tested, time-proven, Scriptures given to us by the men who walked with and listened to and touched Jesus Himself—have to say. My point is that I am not just giving you my opinion. I am giving you my opinion about what the Bible says. There’s a huge difference. If I give you nothing more than my opinions, then my opinion is no better than anyone else’s. But, if I am right about what the Bible says, then I am giving you God’s opinion—God’s truth. In fact, I would never want you to simply believe my opinion about what the Bible says without reading it for yourself and checking to see if what I say is true. I plead with you to open your Bible and see if what I say is true. Also, I’m going to quote a few verses in the remainder of this letter. All the verses I quote to you will be taken from the Bible I received at my confirmation, the New American Bible—the Roman Catholic translation of the Scriptures. I hope this will not make you feel I am using that gift from the RCC as a weapon against the RCC, but to demonstrate that what I believe has not been derived from a potentially biased, “Protestant” translation of Scripture. I hope you will listen to what I have to say because I am someone who loves you and is convinced (even though I may be wrong) that what I believe is an accurate interpretation of the Bible.
I want to tell you the heart of what I believe. I’m not talking about all the secondary things, but the spiritual life and death matter of how someone can know for sure they will go to heaven when they die. The Bible does tell us we can know for sure that we will go to heaven when we die. For many years I thought only an arrogant person could claim to know for sure. But, I have come to understand and believe that this is exactly what Jesus promised and the Bible teaches.
I want to be clear, so please be patient with me. The Bible basically tells us there is bad news and good news. I don’t want to be overly simplistic, but this seems like a good summary. The bad news is about us. The good news is about God. First of all, the Bible teaches repeatedly that we are sinners. I’m guessing you agree with that, but let me quote Romans 3:10-12 and 23 for example:
“It is as Scripture says: There is no just man, not even one; there is no one who understands, no one in search of God. All have taken the wrong course, all alike have become worthless; not one of them acts uprightly, no not one…All men have sinned and are deprived of the glory of God.”
That phrase, “…deprived of the glory of God” literally means, “…fall short of the glory of God.” The idea is that even though some people are better than others, we all fall short of God’s holiness. To illustrate, if we stepped outside (assuming you are in the United States as you read this) and threw a rock as far as we could, I’m guessing I would probably throw the farthest—maybe I’m wrong. Maybe you could throw farther. But, if the goal was not to throw farther than you, but the goal was to throw a rock to Germany, I couldn’t even come close. You couldn’t either. We all fall short. We are all sinners—none of us are “just” compared to God’s righteous standards.
I think you’ll agree that this is bad news, but the bad news gets worse. Romans 6:23 says,
“The wages of sin is death…”
It’s a big deal that we are all sinners. It’s not just a matter of saying, “O well, I’m not perfect.” Sin is a big deal because the penalty is death. The word “wages” is pretty clear. When someone works a job they “earn” a wage. By being sinners, we “earn” death, which is more than just physical death, but spiritual death or eternal separation from God—hell. Again, I’m convinced that I’m not telling you anything—yet—that you disagree with.
Fortunately, the Bible gives us good news also. In fact, the word “gospel” literally means “good news.” And, for the sake of clarity, let me mention something else I know you believe: Christ died for our sins. This is the first part of the good news. Romans 5:8 says, “It is precisely in this that God proves his love for us: that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”
This, of course, speaks about God’s motivation and purpose. He loves us, so in order to “fix” (for lack of a better word) our hopeless, sinful situation, Christ died for us. Someone has compared this to the impossible notion of the transfer of cancer from one person to another. That Christ died in our place is like one person taking the cancer out of another person and putting it into his own body so that he might die in the place of the one who was doomed. This is very good news for us.
My final point is where I have disagreed with most Catholics in past discussions. The good news is not only that Christ died for our sins, but that we can be saved through faith. On the surface that might not sound like something you disagree with, but let me explain how I understand that. Ephesians 2:8,9 says,
“I repeat, it is owing to his (God’s, v. 7) favor that salvation is yours through faith. This is not your own doing, it is God’s gift; neither is it a reward for anything you have accomplished, so let no one pride himself in it.”
I believe these verses as well as many others teach that when we believe in Jesus we are saved. This sounds awfully simple, but I think that’s because the English word “believe” does not necessarily convey what the Bible means when it says “believe.” When we believe—in the Biblical sense—we must first have knowledge of who Christ is and accept that what He has done for us is the truth. That’s common sense. Obviously, we don’t believe in Christ at all if we don’t know who He is or we don’t accept that what we know about Him is true. But, when the Bible says “believe” it also includes the idea of “trust”—trusting Him alone to save you. A good illustration is a chair. Before you sit down in a chair, you might examine it to see if it looks like it is well-built, and you might even say that you “believe” the chair will hold you. But, if you really “believe”—in the Biblical sense—you will sit down and trust the chair to hold your full weight.
Most Catholics accept as true what the Bible teaches about who Jesus is and what He has done for us. The real question—that which gets to the heart of my differences with the RCC—is, “Who or what you are ‘trusting’ for your eternal destiny?” Most Catholics will respond that they are trusting Christ to save them. But here is the crux of the matter: Because official Roman Catholic doctrine teaches that other things are necessary in order to be saved, you need to ask whether you are trusting Christ alone to save you. What exactly do you believe? Do you believe official Roman Catholic doctrine—that you must do other things in order to be saved? By “other things” I mean anything other than believing—trusting—in Christ alone to get you to heaven when you die? Let me use another illustration. Take a look at these 3 circles:

If you were really honest with yourself and God, which circle would you say best describes what you believe it takes to get to heaven? Do you believe your own good works can get you to heaven? If you did, then you would be saying Christ’s death on the cross was completely unnecessary. I know you don’t believe that—never met a Catholic who did. So, would you say that you are trusting Christ’s death on the cross and His resurrection in addition to your own keeping of the sacraments or any other deeds or actions to get you to heaven? Or, would you say that the third circle best describes you? Are you trusting in Christ alone for your eternal destiny?
The second circle is a description of how I understand official Roman Catholic doctrine. Before I quote a couple passages from the Cathechism of the Catholic Church, let me say that it contains many, many things I wholeheartedly agree with! It’s not that I disagree with everything the Roman Catholic Church teaches. But, I do disagree with what it teaches on some very important essentials of the faith because these teachings contradict the Bible. For example:
“The Church affirms that for believers the sacraments of the New Covenant are necessary for salvation.” (Cathechism, paragraph 1129, page 319).
“The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation … The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude…” (Catechism, paragraph 1257, page 352).
This is consistent with what was stated in the Council of Trent:
“If anyone says that the sacraments … and that without them … men obtain from God through faith alone the grace of justification … let him be anathema” (Roman Catholic Council of Trent, 1545-63; 7th Session, Canon 4, 52).
The “anyone” this statement was directed at was the Reformers of the Great Reformation. The biggest issue of the Reformation—led mostly by RC priests—was that “men obtain from God through faith alone the grace of justification.” Ironically, one of the few times “anathema” (accursed; “a curse be on him”) is used in the New Testament, it is used against the one who would add to the gospel:
“I am amazed that you are so quickly forsaking the one who called you by (the) grace (of Christ) for a different gospel (not that there is another). But there are some who are disturbing you and wish to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach (to you) a gospel other than the one that we preached to you, let that one be accursed (anathema)! As we have said before, and now I say again, if anyone preaches to you a gospel other than the one that you received, let that one be accursed (anathema)! Am I now currying favor with human beings or God? Or am I seeking to please people? If I were still trying to please people, I would not be a slave of Christ.” (Galatians 1:6-10)
A few verses later, in chapter 3, verses 11-15, Paul clarifies the true gospel—the gospel he had preached to the Galatians:
“And that no one is justified before God by the law is clear, for ‘the one who is righteous by faith will live.’ But the law does not depend on faith; rather, ‘the one who does these things will live by them.’ Christ ransomed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written, ‘Cursed be everyone who hangs on a tree,’ that the blessing of Abraham might be extended to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.” (italics mine)
I also did a search on a Roman Catholic website (http://www.christusrex.org/www1/CDHN/ccc.html) containing the entire text of the Catechism. I typed in three words: “necessary for salvation.” This is what came up:
980. “It is through the sacrament of Penance that the baptized can be reconciled with God and with the Church: Penance has rightly been called by the holy Fathers ‘a laborious kind of baptism.’ This sacrament of Penance is NECESSARY FOR SALVATION for those who have fallen after Baptism, just as Baptism is NECESSARY FOR SALVATION for those who have not yet been reborn. [Council Of Trent (1551): DS 1672; Cf. St. Gregory Of Nazianzus, Oratio 39,17: PG 36,356.]”
1129. “The Church affirms that for believers the sacraments of the New Covenant are NECESSARY FOR SALVATION. [Cf. Council of Trent (1547): DS 1604.] ‘Sacramental grace’ is the grace of the Holy Spirit, given by Christ and proper to each sacrament. The Spirit heals and transforms those who receive him by conforming them to the Son of God. The fruit of the sacramental life is that the Spirit of adoption makes the faithful partakers in the divine nature [Cf. 2Pet 1:4.] by uniting them in a living union with the only Son, the Savior.”
1277. “Baptism is birth into the new life in Christ. In accordance with the Lord’s will, it is NECESSARY FOR SALVATION, as is the Church herself, which we enter by Baptism.”
1816. “The disciple of Christ must not only keep the faith and live on it, but also profess it, confidently bear witness to it, and spread it: ‘All however must be prepared to confess Christ before men and to follow him along the way of the Cross, amidst the persecutions which the Church never lacks.’ [LG 42; cf. DH 14.] Service of and witness to the faith are NECESSARY FOR SALVATION: ‘So every one who acknowledges me before men, I also will acknowledge before my Father who is in heaven; but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven.’ [Mt 10:32-33 .]”
2036. “The authority of the Magisterium extends also to the specific precepts of the natural law, because their observance, demanded by the Creator, is NECESSARY FOR SALVATION. In recalling the prescriptions of the natural law, the Magisterium of the Church exercises an essential part of its prophetic office of proclaiming to men what they truly are and reminding them of what they should be before God. [Cf. DH 14.]”
I don’t quote these things to be combative, but to make the point that as I understand it, official Roman Catholic doctrine teaches that salvation requires a combination of Christ’s work and our own.
In fact, Karl Keating, a widely-read and well-known Roman Catholic apologist clearly states in his book, Catholicism and Fundamentalism (p.175): “For Catholics, salvation depends on the state of the soul at death. Christ…did his part, and now we have to cooperate by doing ours.”
This takes me back to the circles. If we are to believe that it is a combination of Christ’s work plus our own “part” that gets us into heaven wasn’t Christ’s death insufficient? Aren’t we saying it just wasn’t good enough? I believe the third circle is what represents what the Bible teaches: Christ’s death for our sins was sufficient to save us. He Himself said, “It is finished” on the cross. That literally means, “Paid in full.” What was paid in full? It has to mean our sin debt was paid in full. It was a gift as Ephesians 2:8,9 says. Our only responsibility is to believe; to put our full weight in that chair; to trust Christ and Christ alone for our eternal destiny.
This is the reason I’m concerned about you. I’m convinced that official Roman Catholic doctrine teaches “a different gospel”. Please consider—for yourself—what you really believe. Who or what are you trusting to get you into heaven? That’s what I am asking—this is the first major purpose of this letter.
The second major purpose of this letter is to clarify (hopefully) what it is that I believe. I believe I am saved and destined for eternal life in heaven—not because of anything I have done but because of what Christ has done. May I quote two more passages of Scripture (again, these are from my Catholic translation)? John 5:24 is from Jesus Himself:
“I solemnly assure you, the man who hears my word and has faith in him who sent me possesses eternal life. He does not come under condemnation, but has passed from death to life.”
Notice—no penance, no sacraments, no baptism, no works—just hearing His word and putting faith in Christ. I have heard His word, accepted it as true and have put my faith—trust—in Christ alone to save me. Is it arrogant (as I once believed) to say that I know that I “possess eternal life”? Am I arrogant to say that I know I will not “come under condemnation”? I don’t think so, because Jesus promises that when someone has put his faith in Him he “passes from death to life.” I would be arrogant if I thought I was good enough to get to heaven through my own good works, but my assurance lies in the greatness of Jesus and the sufficiency of His death and resurrection—not in anything I am or have done. I’m confident that my wife and children can rejoice at my funeral because I will be in heaven with my Lord!
1 John 5:11-13 is more proof of this understanding:
“…God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever possesses the Son possesses life; whoever does not possess the Son of God does not possess life. I have written this to you to make you realize that you possess eternal life—you who believe in the name of the Son of God.”
A few observations:
- John said God “gave” us eternal life—past tense. “Eternal” life by its nature must be a permanent gift. How can finite creatures like us earn something eternal? And, if we can lose it, it was never really “eternal”.
- Those who “possess” the Son “possess” life. Those who do not “possess” Jesus do not “possess” life. In other words, Jesus is the only way—it’s all about Jesus, not our works, not our goodness or badness.
- John’s point in writing these things (“I have written this to you…”) was to “make (them) realize” that they “possess eternal life” (present tense)! Who possesses eternal life? “You who believe” in Jesus. There it is again—faith! Eternal life comes from trusting in Jesus alone.
I believe that the Bible teaches that you can know for sure that you are going to heaven when you die. In other words, I believe you can know for sure that you have eternal life—not because any of us will be sinless in this life or because any of us can say enough hail marys or do enough penance. I believe you can know for sure that you have eternal life based on the promises and work of Jesus. This letter to you—my Catholic friends—comes from these firmly held beliefs.
If you have read this far—thank you. I truly appreciate your willingness to read this long and difficult letter. I would love for you to reply. I would love the chance to clarify any part of this letter. What I would most love is for you to respond to the truth of this letter and trust Jesus Christ alone for eternal life.
If I have said something in this letter which offends you, please understand that it is not my intent to be offensive, but what kind of fireman would I be if I left you in a place of great danger without trying to convince you of the reality of that danger? What kind of person would I be if I believed you might not be going to heaven, but I kept my mouth shut?
As I conclude this letter, I pray to the Father who so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that He would open your heart that you will believe and not perish, but have eternal life (John 3:16).
Sincerely and respectfully,
Shaun LePage
906 N. 1464 Rd.